Comments on: Studies in Dialectical Libertarianism: Part One Outline http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/2006/09/13/studies-in-dialectical-libertarianism-part-one-outline/ Philosophical Anarchism, Free Market Economics, and Cultural Bohemianism Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:32:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Matt Jenny http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/2006/09/13/studies-in-dialectical-libertarianism-part-one-outline/#comment-65 Matt Jenny Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:38:07 +0000 http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/?p=106#comment-65 Oh by the way, sorry for the stupid BB-code. I thought this was possible in WordPress. Oh by the way, sorry for the stupid BB-code. I thought this was possible in WordPress.

]]> By: Nick Manley http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/2006/09/13/studies-in-dialectical-libertarianism-part-one-outline/#comment-64 Nick Manley Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:16:09 +0000 http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/?p=106#comment-64 Matt, A very constructive point. Pacifist libertarians would likely consider any use of coercion to imply statism but I'm not among them. Coercion used to obtain restitution would fall under the banner of retaliatory force and thus part of the market. Jeremy, Thanks! Matt,
A very constructive point. Pacifist libertarians would likely consider any use of coercion to imply statism but I’m not among them. Coercion used to obtain restitution would fall under the banner of retaliatory force and thus part of the market.

Jeremy,
Thanks!

]]> By: Jeremy http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/2006/09/13/studies-in-dialectical-libertarianism-part-one-outline/#comment-62 Jeremy Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:24:50 +0000 http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/?p=106#comment-62 Nice! Nice!

]]> By: Matt Jenny http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/2006/09/13/studies-in-dialectical-libertarianism-part-one-outline/#comment-61 Matt Jenny Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:32:52 +0000 http://www.lifeloveandliberty.com/?p=106#comment-61 Sounds interesting! Take care that you don't confuse coercion and aggression (See Kinsella's post [url=http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/010897.html]here[/url]). I think Konkin got it wrong. I think if one acts non-[i]aggressively[/i], one is part of the market. Restitution sometimes requires coercion. Still, restitution is surely part of the market. Or are there tiny bubbles of statism in anarchy every time someone is forced to pay restitution. Sounds interesting! Take care that you don’t confuse coercion and aggression (See Kinsella’s post [url=http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/010897.html]here[/url]). I think Konkin got it wrong. I think if one acts non-[i]aggressively[/i], one is part of the market. Restitution sometimes requires coercion. Still, restitution is surely part of the market. Or are there tiny bubbles of statism in anarchy every time someone is forced to pay restitution.

]]>